| View All Hybrid Headphones | ||||
 |
| User Ratings & Opinions |
 |
 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|  |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
| 33 out of 45 found the following review helpful: | |
  |
**Important** Sound Quality |
| User: mike webster, Dec 9, 2007 | |
| |
| So, I purchased the 2n1 pro headset and was also very disappointed with the sound quality. The high ranges were very tinny and the bass range was almost non-existent. This is coming from someone who doesnt know the difference between E flat major and Major Tom. Anyway, the sound quality of this headset was literally the WORST of all of the dozen or so Ive used with my Treo and before that my iPod. I thought about going back to my Sony Funtopia(?) in-ear headphones, that seem to be similar technology to the palm in-ear Pro headset, because I remember they had great sound in a small form factor and stayed snug and comfortable in my ears. See this URL: http://www.jr.com/JRProductPage.process?Product=4035113 I looked at them both side-by-side, the speaker diameter was the same and I realized that the rubber ear pieces from the Sonys would work on the Palm headset. So I switched them and VIOLA! All of the sudden, the Palm headset sounded JUST AS GOOD as the Sonys. Just for the hell of it, I put the Palm rubber ear pieces on the Sony headset and AMAZING, they sounded just as bad as the Palms originally were. So, my suggestion is, if you have the old Sony Funtopias lying around or can procure replacement rubber earpieces for them (the Sonys shipped with 3 different sizes), then do it. I would also humbly suggest to Palm that they stop being miserly and ship these things with the right rubber ear pieces in 3 sizes like the Sonys do and stop (ONCE AGAIN) from giving us great products with the one fatal flaw that renders them inferior. | |
| |
| Did you find this opinion helpful? | |
 | |
